Skip to Content
Math416Complex Variables (Lecture 16)

Math416 Lecture 16

Answer checking for exam

Q1

Cauchy riemann equations:

∂u∂x=∂v∂yand∂u∂y=−∂v∂x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\quad\text{and}\quad\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}

Liouville’s Theorem:

Any non-constant entire function is unbounded.

So cos⁡(z)\cos(z) is unbounded in C\mathbb{C}.

Log(−e2)=ln⁡∣−e2∣+iarg⁡(−e2)=−2+πi\text{Log}(-e^2) = \ln|-e^2| + i\arg(-e^2) = -2 + \pi i

At any point z0∈C∖{0}z_0\in \mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, there is an open set z0∈U⊂Cz_0\in U\subset \mathbb{C} and a branch of logarithm defined on UU.

Q2

Power series expansion

Q3

limit superior

Q4

Bound integral

Q5

fnf_n converges pointwise to ff on UU if ∀z∈U\forall z\in U, ∀ϵ>0\forall \epsilon > 0, ∃N\exists N s.t. ∀n≥N\forall n\geq N, ∣fn(z)−f(z)∣<ϵ|f_n(z)-f(z)| < \epsilon.

fnf_n converges uniformly to ff on UU if ∀ϵ>0\forall \epsilon > 0, ∃N\exists N s.t. ∀n≥N\forall n\geq N, ∀z∈U\forall z\in U, ∣fn(z)−f(z)∣<ϵ|f_n(z)-f(z)| < \epsilon.

Show for ∣z∣<1|z|<1, fn(z)=znf_n(z)=z^n converges pointwise to 00 but not uniformly to 00.

(a) pointwise convergence:

∣zn∣=∣z∣n<ϵ|z^n| = |z|^n < \epsilon if n>ln⁡ϵln⁡∣z∣n > \frac{\ln\epsilon}{\ln|z|}.

(b) uniform convergence:

No matter how small ϵ\epsilon is, there is always a zz s.t. ∣zn∣>ϵ|z^n| > \epsilon for all nn.

Continue from last lecture

Schwarz’s Lemma

Let ff be an holomorphic function that maps the unit disk D(0,1)D(0,1) to itself and f(0)=0f(0)=0. Then ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)|\leq |z| for all z∈D(0,1)z\in D(0,1)

Schwarz-Pick’s Lemma

(see exercise 7.17.2)

Let ff be an holomorphic function that maps the unit disk D(0,1)D(0,1) to itself. Then ∀z,w∈D(0,1)\forall z,w\in D(0,1),

∣f(z)−f(w)1−f(w)‾f(z)∣≤∣z−w1−w‾z∣\left|\frac{f(z)-f(w)}{1-\overline{f(w)}f(z)}\right|\leq \left|\frac{z-w}{1-\overline{w}z}\right|

Recall the Möbius map

ϕα(z)=z−α1−α‾z\phi_\alpha(z) = \frac{z-\alpha}{1-\overline{\alpha}z}

is a homeomorphism of the unit disk.

So we can use the Möbius to restate the Schwarz-Pick’s Lemma as:

∣ϕf(w)(f(z))∣≤∣ϕw(z)∣|\phi_{f(w)}(f(z))|\leq |\phi_w(z)|

Suppose we defined g=ϕf(w)∘f∘ϕ−wg=\phi_{f(w)}\circ f\circ \phi_{-w}, then gg is a holomorphic function that maps the unit disk to itself and g(0)=0g(0)=0.

By Schwarz’s Lemma, let z∈D(0,1)z\in D(0,1), ∣g(z)∣≤∣z∣|g(z)|\leq |z|.

∣ϕf(w)(f(ϕ−w(z)))∣≤∣z∣|\phi_{f(w)}(f(\phi_{-w}(z)))|\leq |z|

Let ζ=ϕ−w(z)\zeta=\phi_{-w}(z), then ζ=z+w1+w‾z∈D(0,1)\zeta=\frac{z+w}{1+\overline{w}z}\in D(0,1), so ∣ζ∣=ϕw(z)|\zeta|=\phi_w(z).

Extension of Schwarz-Pick’s Lemma in hyperbolic metric

Suppose we defined the distance on C\mathbb{C} as d(z,w)=∣z−w1−w‾z∣d(z,w)=|\frac{z-w}{1-\overline{w}z}|.

We claim that this is a metric on C\mathbb{C}. ∀z,w,v∈C\forall z,w,v\in \mathbb{C}:

(a) d(z,w)=0d(z,w)=0 if and only if z=wz=w and d(z,w)>0d(z,w)> 0 otherwise.

(b) d(z,w)=d(w,z)d(z,w)=d(w,z).

(c) d(z,w)≤d(z,v)+d(v,w)d(z,w)\leq d(z,v)+d(v,w).

We call this metric the Pseudo hyperbolic metric.

Hyperbolic metric:

Hypdist(z,w)=tanh⁡−1(d(z,w)) \text{Hypdist}(z,w)=\tanh^{-1}(d(z,w))

Where d(z,w)=∣z−w1−w‾z∣d(z,w)=|\frac{z-w}{1-\overline{w}z}|

So we can restate the Schwarz-Pick’s Lemma as:

d(f(z),f(w))≤d(z,w)d(f(z),f(w))\leq d(z,w)

And in hyperbolic metric, it becomes:

Hypdist(f(z),f(w))≤Hypdist(z,w)\text{Hypdist}(f(z),f(w))\leq \text{Hypdist}(z,w)

Suppose the equality holds for Schwarz-Pick’s Lemma, then ∣g(z)∣=τz|g(z)|=\tau z where ∣τ∣=1|\tau|=1.

Computation ignored here.

Then ff is a Möbius map that is automorphism of the unit disk.

Existence of harmonic conjugate

Suppose f=u+ivf=u+iv is holomorphic on a domain U⊂CU\subset \mathbb{C}. Then u=Re(f)u=\text{Re}(f) is harmonic on UU. That is Δu=∂2u∂x2+∂2u∂y2=0\Delta u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=0.

Theorem 7.18

Let uu be a real harmonic function on a convex domain G⊂CG\subset \mathbb{C}. Then there exists g∈O(G)g\in O(G) such that Re(g)=u\text{Re}(g)=u. Moreover, gg is unique up to an additive imaginary constant.

Proof:

Existence next time.

Uniqueness:

Suppose g,h∈O(G)g,h\in O(G) s.t. Re(g)=Re(h)=u\text{Re}(g)=\text{Re}(h)=u.

Reg=u=Reh\text{Re}g=u=\text{Re}h on GG.

If we can show that (g−h)′=0(g-h)'=0 on GG, then we win.

Let g=u+ivg=u+iv, h=u+iwh=u+iw.

By the Cauchy-Riemann equations,

∂∂x(g−h)=∂∂xi(v−w)=i(∂u∂y−∂u∂y)=0\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(g-h)&=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}i(v-w)\\ &=i\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\\ &=0 \end{aligned}

Suppose G=C∖{0}G=\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, then u=ln⁡∣z∣=12ln⁡(x2+y2)u=\ln|z|=\frac{1}{2}\ln(x^2+y^2), which is harmonic.

Continue next time.

Last updated on