Skip to Content
Math416Complex Variables (Lecture 4)

Math416 Lecture 4

Review

Derivative of a complex function

∂f∂z=12(∂f∂x−∂f∂y)\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right) ∂f∂zˉ=12(∂f∂x+∂f∂y)\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar{z}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)

Angle between two curves

Let γ1,γ2\gamma_1,\gamma_2 be two curves in G⊂CG\subset \mathbb{C} with γ1(t0)=γ2(t0)=z0\gamma_1(t_0)=\gamma_2(t_0)=z_0 for some t0∈I1∩I2t_0\in I_1\cap I_2.

The angle between γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 at z0z_0 is the angle between the vectors γ1′(t0)\gamma_1'(t_0) and γ2′(t0)\gamma_2'(t_0). Denote as arg⁡(γ2′(t0))−arg⁡(γ1′(t0))=arg⁡(γ2′(t0)γ1′(t0))\arg(\gamma_2'(t_0))-\arg(\gamma_1'(t_0))=\arg(\gamma_2'(t_0)\gamma_1'(t_0)).

Cauchy-Riemann equations

∂f∂z=12(∂f∂x−∂f∂y)\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)

Continue on last lecture

Theorem of conformality

Suppose f:G→Cf:G\to \mathbb{C} is holomorphic function on open set G⊂CG\subset \mathbb{C} and γ1,γ2\gamma_1,\gamma_2 are regular curves in GG with γ1(t0)=γ2(t0)=z0\gamma_1(t_0)=\gamma_2(t_0)=z_0 for some t0∈I1∩I2t_0\in I_1\cap I_2.

If f′(z0)≠0f'(z_0)\neq 0, then the angle between γ1\gamma_1 and γ2\gamma_2 at z0z_0 is the same as the angle between the vectors f′(z0)γ1′(t0)f'(z_0)\gamma_1'(t_0) and f′(z0)γ2′(t0)f'(z_0)\gamma_2'(t_0).

Lemma of function of a curve and angle

If f:G→Cf:G\to \mathbb{C} is holomorphic function on open set G⊂CG\subset \mathbb{C} and γ\gamma is differentiable curve in GG with γ(t0)=z0\gamma(t_0)=z_0 for some t0∈It_0\in I.

Then,

(f∘γ)′(t0)=f′(γ(t0))γ′(t0).(f\circ \gamma)'(t_0)=f'(\gamma(t_0))\gamma'(t_0).

Looks like the chain rule.

Proof

We want to show that

lim⁡t→t0(f∘γ)(t)−(f∘γ)(t0)t−t0=f′(γ(t0))γ′(t0).\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{(f\circ \gamma)(t)-(f\circ \gamma)(t_0)}{t-t_0}=f'(\gamma(t_0))\gamma'(t_0).

Notation:

A function g(h)g(h) is O(h)O(h) if ∃C>0\exists C>0 such that ∣g(h)∣≤C∣h∣|g(h)|\leq C|h| for all hh in a neighborhood of 00.

A function g(h)g(h) is o(h)o(h) if lim⁡h→0g(h)h=0\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{g(h)}{h}=0.

ff is differentiable if and only if f(z+h)=f(z)+f′(z)h+12h2f′′(z)+o(h3)f(z+h)=f(z)+f'(z)h+\frac{1}{2}h^2f''(z)+o(h^3) as h→0h\to 0. (By Taylor expansion)

Since ff is holomorphic at γ(t0)=z0\gamma(t_0)=z_0, we have

f(z0)=f(z0)+(z−z0)f′(z0)+o(z−z0)f(z_0)=f(z_0)+(z-z_0)f'(z_0)+o(z-z_0)

This result comes from Taylor Expansion of the derivative of the function around the point z0z_0

and

f(γ(t0))=f(γ(t0))+f′(γ(t0))(γ(t)−γ(t0))+o(γ(t)−γ(t0))f(\gamma(t_0))=f(\gamma(t_0))+f'(\gamma(t_0))(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))+o(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))

So,

lim⁡t→t0(f∘γ)(t)−(f∘γ)(t0)t−t0=lim⁡t→t0[f(γ(t0))+f′(γ(t0))(γ(t)−γ(t0))+o(γ(t)−γ(t0))]−f(γ(t0))t−t0=lim⁡t→t0f′(γ(t0))(γ(t)−γ(t0))+o(γ(t)−γ(t0))t−t0=lim⁡t→t0f′(γ(t0))(γ(t)−γ(t0))t−t0+lim⁡t→t0o(γ(t)−γ(t0))t−t0=f′(γ(t0))lim⁡t→t0γ(t)−γ(t0)t−t0+0=f′(γ(t0))γ′(t0)\begin{aligned} \lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{(f\circ \gamma)(t)-(f\circ \gamma)(t_0)}{t-t_0} &=\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{\left[f(\gamma(t_0))+f'(\gamma(t_0))(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))+o(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))\right]-f(\gamma(t_0))}{t-t_0} \\ &=\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{f'(\gamma(t_0))(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))+o(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))}{t-t_0} \\ &=\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{f'(\gamma(t_0))(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))}{t-t_0} +\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{o(\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0))}{t-t_0} \\ &=f'(\gamma(t_0))\lim_{t\to t_0}\frac{\gamma(t)-\gamma(t_0)}{t-t_0} +0\\ &=f'(\gamma(t_0))\gamma'(t_0) \end{aligned}

Definition 2.12 (Conformal function)

A function f:G→Cf:G\to \mathbb{C} is called conformal if it preserves the angle between two curves.

Theorem 2.13 (Conformal function)

If f:G→Cf:G\to \mathbb{C} is conformal at z0∈Gz_0\in G, then ff is holomorphic at z0z_0 and f′(z0)≠0f'(z_0)\neq 0.

Example:

f(z)=z2f(z)=z^2

is not conformal at z=0z=0 because f′(0)=0f'(0)=0.

Lemma of conformal function

Suppose ff is real differentiable, let a=∂f∂z(z0)a=\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(z_0), b=∂f∂z‾(z0)b=\frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}(z_0).

Let γ(t0)=z0\gamma(t_0)=z_0. Then (f∘γ)′(t0)=aγ′(t0)+bγ′(t0)‾(f\circ \gamma)'(t_0)=a\gamma'(t_0)+b\overline{\gamma'(t_0)}.

Proof

f=u+ivf=u+iv, u,vu,v are real differentiable.

a=∂f∂z=12(∂u∂x+∂v∂y)+i12(∂v∂x−∂u∂y)a=\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)+i\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right) b=∂f∂z‾=12(∂u∂x−∂v∂y)+i12(∂v∂x+∂u∂y)b=\frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)+i\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right) γ′(t0)=dαdt+idβdt\gamma'(t_0)=\frac{d\alpha}{dt}+i\frac{d\beta}{dt} γ′(t0)‾=dβdt−idαdt\overline{\gamma'(t_0)}=\frac{d\beta}{dt}-i\frac{d\alpha}{dt} (f∘γ)′(t0)=∂f∂z(γ(t0))γ′(t0)+∂f∂z‾(γ(t0))γ′(t0)‾=[12(∂u∂x+∂v∂y)+i12(∂v∂x−∂u∂y)](dαdt+idβdt)+[12(∂u∂x−∂v∂y)+i12(∂v∂x+∂u∂y)](dβdt−idαdt)=[12(∂u∂x+∂v∂y)dαdt−12(∂v∂x−∂u∂y)dβdt]+i[12(∂v∂x−∂u∂y)dαdt+12(∂u∂x+∂v∂y)dβdt]=[a+b]dαdt+i[a−b]dβdt=[ux+ivx]dαdt+i[vy−iuy]dβdt=aγ′(t0)+bγ′(t0)‾\begin{aligned} (f\circ \gamma)'(t_0)&=\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(\gamma(t_0))\gamma'(t_0)+\frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}(\gamma(t_0))\overline{\gamma'(t_0)} \\ &=\left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)+i\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\right]\left(\frac{d\alpha}{dt}+i\frac{d\beta}{dt}\right)\\ &+\left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)+i\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\right]\left(\frac{d\beta}{dt}-i\frac{d\alpha}{dt}\right) \\ &=\left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)\frac{d\alpha}{dt}-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\frac{d\beta}{dt}\right]\\ &+i\left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\frac{d\alpha}{dt}+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)\frac{d\beta}{dt}\right] \\ &=\left[a+b\right]\frac{d\alpha}{dt}+i\left[a-b\right]\frac{d\beta}{dt} \\ &=\left[u_x+iv_x\right]\frac{d\alpha}{dt}+i\left[v_y-iu_y\right]\frac{d\beta}{dt} \\ &=a\gamma'(t_0)+b\overline{\gamma'(t_0)} \end{aligned}

Theorem of differentiability

Let f:G→Cf:G\to \mathbb{C} be a function defined on an open set G⊂CG\subset \mathbb{C} that is both holomorphic and (real) differentiable, where f=u+ivf=u+iv with u,vu,v real differentiable functions.

Then, ff is conformal at every point z0∈Gz_0\in G if and only if ff is holomorphic at z0z_0 and f′(z0)≠0f'(z_0)\neq 0.

Proof

We prove the equivalence in two parts.

(  ⟹  \implies) Suppose that ff is conformal at z0z_0. By definition, conformality means that ff preserves angles (including their orientation) between any two intersecting curves through z0z_0. In the language of real analysis, this requires that the (real) derivative (Jacobian) of ff at z0z_0, Df(z0)Df(z_0), acts as a similarity transformation. Any similarity in R2\mathbb{R}^2 can be written as a rotation combined with a scaling; in particular, its matrix representation has the form

(A−BBA),\begin{pmatrix} A & -B \\ B & A \end{pmatrix},

for some real numbers AA and BB. This is exactly the matrix corresponding to multiplication by the complex number a=A+iBa=A+iB. Therefore, the Cauchy-Riemann equations must hold at z0z_0, implying that ff is holomorphic at z0z_0. Moreover, because the transformation is nondegenerate (preserving angles implies nonzero scaling), we must have f′(z0)=a≠0f'(z_0)=a\neq 0.

(  ⟸  \impliedby) Now suppose that ff is holomorphic at z0z_0 and f′(z0)≠0f'(z_0)\neq 0. Then by the definition of the complex derivative, the first-order (linear) approximation of ff near z0z_0 is

f(z0+h)=f(z0)+f′(z0)h+o(∣h∣),f(z_0+h)=f(z_0)+f'(z_0)h+o(|h|),

for small h∈Ch\in\mathbb{C}. Multiplication by the nonzero complex number f′(z0)f'(z_0) is exactly a rotation and scaling (i.e., a similarity transformation). Therefore, for any smooth curve γ(t)\gamma(t) with γ(t0)=z0\gamma(t_0)=z_0, we have

(f∘γ)′(t0)=f′(z0)γ′(t0),(f\circ\gamma)'(t_0)=f'(z_0)\gamma'(t_0),

and the angle between any two tangent vectors at z0z_0 is preserved (up to the fixed rotation). Hence, ff is conformal at z0z_0.

For further illustration, consider the special case when ff is an affine map.

Case 1: Suppose

f(z)=az+bz‾.f(z)=az+b\overline{z}.

The Wirtinger derivatives of ff are

∂f∂z=aand∂f∂z‾=b.\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=a \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}=b.

For ff to be holomorphic, we require ∂f∂z‾=b=0\frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}=b=0. Moreover, to have a nondegenerate (angle-preserving) map, we must have a≠0a\neq 0. If b≠0b\neq 0, then the map mixes zz and z‾\overline{z}, and one can check that the linearization maps the real axis R\mathbb{R} into the set {(a+b)t}\{(a+b)t\}, which does not uniformly scale and rotate all directions. Thus, ff fails to be conformal when b≠0b\neq 0.

Case 2: For a general holomorphic function, the lemma of conformal functions shows that if

(f∘γ)′(t0)=f′(z0)γ′(t0)(f\circ \gamma)'(t_0)=f'(z_0)\gamma'(t_0)

for any differentiable curve γ\gamma through z0z_0, then the effect of ff near z0z_0 is exactly given by multiplication by f′(z0)f'(z_0). Since multiplication by a nonzero complex number is a similarity transformation, ff is conformal at z0z_0.

Harmonic function

Let Ω\Omega be a domain in C\mathbb{C}. A function u:Ω→Ru:\Omega\to \mathbb{R}

A domain is a connected open set.

Say g:Ω→R or Cg:\Omega\to \mathbb{R} \text{ or } \mathbb{C} is harmonic if it satisfies the Laplace equation

Δg=∂2g∂x2+∂2g∂y2=0.\Delta g=\frac{\partial^2 g}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 g}{\partial y^2}=0.

Theorem of harmonic conjugate

Let f=u+ivf=u+iv be holomorphic function on domain Ω⊂C\Omega\subset \mathbb{C}. Then uu and vv are harmonic functions on Ω\Omega.

Proof

Δu=∂2u∂x2+∂2u∂y2=0.\Delta u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=0.

Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have

∂2u∂x2=∂2v∂x∂y,∂2u∂y2=−∂2v∂y∂x.\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial x\partial y}, \quad \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=-\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial y\partial x}.

So,

Δu=∂2u∂x2+∂2u∂y2=∂2v∂x∂y−∂2v∂y∂x=0.\Delta u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial x\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial y\partial x}=0.

If vv is such that f=u+ivf=u+iv is holomorphic on Ω\Omega, then vv is called harmonic conjugate of uu on Ω\Omega.

Example:

u(x,y)=x2−y2u(x,y)=x^2-y^2

is harmonic on C\mathbb{C}.

To find a harmonic conjugate of uu on C\mathbb{C}, we need to find a function vv such that

∂v∂x=−∂u∂y=2y,∂v∂y=∂u∂x=2x.\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=2y, \quad \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=2x.

Integrating, we get

v(x,y)=2xy+G(y)v(x,y)=2xy+G(y) ∂v∂y=2x+G′(y)=2x\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=2x+G'(y)=2x

So,

G′(y)=0  ⟹  G(y)=CG'(y)=0 \implies G(y)=C v(x,y)=2xy+Cv(x,y)=2xy+C

is a harmonic conjugate of uu on C\mathbb{C}.

Combine uu and vv to get f(x,y)=x2−y2+2xyi+C=(x+iy)2+C=z2+Cf(x,y)=x^2-y^2+2xyi+C=(x+iy)^2+C=z^2+C, which is holomorphic on C\mathbb{C}.

Last updated on